What are you talking about? How about reading for comprehension this time. The post you just replied to says in plain English that "Scott is human." " ...has positive and NEGATIVE lights to his personality......" Who in the hell is worshipping him or equating him with a god? And, yes, you are so right in your contention that a Creed fan Discussion list needs lots of disparaging comments made about the band members. WTF?
I suppose the fans who are more "into" Mark or Flip will post when they are good and ready. Who are you to judge who people should be fans of? No, no--you can't be Scott Stapp's fan, because he already has too many fans who think he is infallible. Again, WTF?
>From: Bklynbaby727@AOL.COM
>Reply-To: Bklynbaby727@AOL.COM
>To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM
>Subject: Re: Quit picking on Scott.....
>Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 23:09:35 EDT
>
>In a message dated 5/7/2002 4:08:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>flippenforstappy@MSN.COM writes:
>
>
> > What does it matter to you mean people whether Scott takes too much cough syrup, pain pills or just too many Samual Adams? You constantly pound across the point that he claims to not be Christian, so who is hurting? How is he being hypocritical? What is your major gripe, anyhow? He's human.
> >
> > You people who have nothing better to do than bash Scott on a discussion list directly connected to the Creed fan website need to get a life. Sure everybody has positive and negative lights to their persona, but I have YET to see any of you bashers post a POSITIVE word about this inspirational man. Scott was so right when he said, "There's just people who don't want anything positive to come out of this world."
> >
> > Hilaree
> >
>
>And what does it matter to you if people choose to bring others back to earth
>and make them realize Scott's a person and not a god? I mean really we need
>some posts to balance out the "Stapp is infallible" tone that's been plaguing
>this list. I mean reading half of these posts you would think there were no
>other members in the band. It's one thing to be a fan, it's another to be a
>worshipper, And really, is Scott or anyone else for that matter worthy of
>worship? I think not.