From: "Tanya" <tanya881@HOTMAIL.COM> To: <CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM> Date: Tue 12 Mar 2002 15:18:17 -0500 |
----- Original Message -----From: Asaf AtiyaSent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:02 PMSubject: Re: StappI totally disagree with you on high maintenance. My last girlfriend, which was really high maintenance was (and still is) the most caring, unmaterialisic person I know. High maintenance just means that they want attention, and from my expirience, it's worth it.----- Original Message -----From: TanyaSent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:26 PMSubject: Re: StappI have yet to meet a high maintenance person that is worth all the trouble in the long run. Being HM to me implies being materialistic and selfish. Looks will eventually fail and then what do you have? A piece of shit that needs to be flushed, but you can't seem to do it since you've invested so much time in keeping it healthy and happy.Fuck that, give me an easy going person, with intelligence, wit, humor and common sense.----- Original Message -----From: ChastitySent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:25 AMSubject: Re: StappI think he would be very high maintenance, but I think it might be worth it. Fact, he is hot so I would pull out all of the feminine wilds to keep him.
Sas Elb <Saselb@AOL.COM> wrote:
Do you think if you were in a relationship with Scott Stapp (either friend or girlfriend)
he would be high maintenance or low maintenance? Why?
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!