From: "Debbi" <debbir@LAFORNARA.COM> To: <CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM> Date: Fri 8 Mar 2002 02:08:40 -0800 |
-----Original Message-----Well, let's see, if I said, for example, that Dawn is a thief, accomplice, or hypocrite, that would be personally singling myself out, and the last time I checked, those are not things that MOST would be proud to be called. Therefore, those words directed toward ONE person specifically, could be interpreted as a personal attack. Also, I am not seeing the relevance of your bible reference. I would also like to know how Jess and I have gone way off on a tangent. The last I checked, theft is theft, which is illegal, "any way you slice it"....
From: Creed Discussion List [mailto:CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM] On Behalf Of Dawn DelliSanti
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:59 AM
To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM
Subject: Re: burning cd's and downloading music
In a message dated 3/8/2002 3:39:16 AM Eastern Standard Time, kthulu@COMTECK.COM writes:
You have to make a personal attack to reveal specifics? Ah well,
doesn’t really matter anyway, does it? “Let he who is without sin cast
the first stone”, and you and Jess have gone WAY off on a tangent
anyway.
-----Original Message-----
From: Creed Discussion List [mailto:CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM] On
Behalf Of Dawn DelliSanti
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:33 AM
To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM
Subject: Re: burning cd's and downloading music
There are ALWAYS specifics, but isn't it against the rules to make
personal attacks, and besides, who am I to point fingers?
To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit:
http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp