Hey Jim!
coming back to electronic communication as a sort
of a sixth sense..
<<I guess I'll define what a sense is to me. It is
something that the
brain uses to detect the outside world. But, we are
"talking", with our
hands/eyes. We are "seeing" what was just "touched"
in. You are percieving me touching with my hands and making words
you may understand. Since i can't hear you. Also, I can't see you. So I am blind
in a way to see who i'm communicating with.>>
Wow!! I liked that bit veeeeeery much.. it even
sounded a bit like poetry.. especially the underlined part (I'm into poetry
btw and I write stuff from time to time) and to me what you just wrote really
had a touch of poetry in it.. have you ever tried writing poetry, btw?
but
coming back to the subject, yes I agree with you here... and that's what I think
about an awful lot - I mean, the virual world which is in its
beginnings of evolution (humans playing God, here btw.. ;-). Virtual world as in
the internet and e-mail etc., of course. I very much doubt that this
virtual world could (in a way) replace our real world, concerning friends above
all. Just because (as you've mentioned) we are blind to who the people we
talk on the net really are (not solely to how they look like, but also how they
behave in real life.. I mean this sort of communication is very
limited if you look at it from this perspective, don't you think?) And this is
why I chose this kind of virtual interaction with people (--> creed
discussion list) because I'm out for discussion on certain topics and not really
getting involved in any sort of senseless chat! (this is why I was so sceptical
about this list in the beginning).. I know that this may sound strange, but I
don't mean it the "I-hate-people-in-general-attitude" kinda way.. It's more of a
"I-want-deep-people-to-be-my-friends" way.. so as you see I am veeery selective
and demanding
Could you ask a blind person to
whom you sometimes talk on the net if he/she minded talking to me? I'd really be
glad to get into a discussion with a blind person
Jackson wrote:
<<Actually, I do see us as the strongest
species on Earth. To quote Kevin
Siembieda, "...(...) What we humans do isn't
survival. It's conquest! It's
complete domination of all life forms. And when
there are no others to
dominate, we turn against each other, killing in anger
and on whim."
Well, that was a long quote and might even have been a little
ways off
topic, but I think that it illustrates pray well why man and not
some
physically stronger species dominates the planet.>> yep I pretty
much agree with you Jackson, although Siembieda mentions not the kinds of things
I'd mention to show that we are the dominant species - I'd probably go
more for the positive aspects.. but I guess the negative ones are
more realistc, huh?
Nonetheless, I am trying to be "something like
human" ;-) (in the positive way, of course)
anyway, dobranoc - hope I haven't bored you to
death (?) And even if I did, I have no mercy ;-) more is coming
on other topics.. like the "sacrifice"-topic (I'll definitely post something on
this one!)
Ewa
wandering through worlds of definitions
but failing to spell my own existence,
defining the world with words that need to be defined
-
does it make sense?