or I've got another "enlightened" (hehe) idea:
such a thing as a meaning can not be seen,
heard, smelt, tasted, or felt primvm dvm, ergo one is searching for that
which can not be found by means of our natural senses - but
what about our super - natural senses (which I believe we do possess) and what
about the mind itself? It's more complicated than the senses which are very
primitive in comparison with the mind (animals also possess senses, but not a
mind, at least not for me, don't know about you, though?) Anyway what do you say
now?
<sitts back with a smile on her face and thinks
to herself: "Have I or have I not outwitted the fellow here?"> ;-)
can't wait to read your reply to that!
Yeah, I agree on the "evolutionary
speaking"-aspect. But I don't think that science and transcendentalism/
spiritualism/ God/ all-controlling force (however you want to name it) exclude
one another. It's all of those false interpretations that make this statement
seem paradox (take the creation of the world according to the Bible as an
example - so many people quarrel about it - and this quarrel is based on the
misinterpretation of the Bible, isn't it?).
gotta go, dobranoc
Ewa