Re: Why the poor performance??

From: "Creed - 7M3 - Live" <creed7m3live@COLUMBUS.RR.COM>
To: <CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM>
Date: Tue
24 Apr 2001 17:42:53 -0400

There you go again knocking the sound system. You should just try to listen to the music. Instead of overanylizing the sound system. :-)

Basically, I thought that Scott looked relaxed during the performance and that Mark seemed to be playing longer riffs on the guitar.

Later,

Jim

--------------------

Verrronica@AOL.COM wrote:

Hi Steve, welcome to the list. I think the reason the song was cut short was
probably due to time contraints, and I also think part of the poor quality
was due to the sound system, it started out sounding bad, but I think he
warmed up near the end. I personally, sort of tuned it out as soon as I
heard them start Higher again.....I'm sick to death of seeing them do that
song. I was really hoping they'd do Are You Ready, so frankly, I didn't pay
enough attention to notice how bad he sounded.

V

In a message dated 4/24/01 1:25:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ICSArpey@AOL.COM
writes:

Does anyone know why Scott sounded so totally bad at the grammy
performance??
And, wasn't there another verse to that song? You may already have
discussed
this, but I am new to this list and was wondering if he had a good excuse
for
such a dissapointing performance...
Steve

--
Eloquence is logic on fire.

To unsubscribe or change your preferences for the Creed-Discuss list, visit: http://www.winduplist.com/ls/discuss/form.asp