Re: Winners

From: <Verrronica@AOL.COM>
To: <CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM>
Date: Tue
27 Mar 2001 21:40:09 EST

That's what I was thinking too Jim......especially for the Bulletin
Board.....they have all those arguments all the time, all those horrible
people posting horrible stuff, then the moderators quitting because they
can't deal anymore......WHY don't they just set up the list with key word
censoring?? I know it can be done, I've heard about it on other bb's.....so
why not the Creed bb and this list? I don't have a problem with
censorship......it's not necessary to use huge amounts of profanity to get
our points across.

V

p.s........Jim, you STILL get my vote.......lol

In a message dated 3/27/01 8:54:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,
creed7m3live@COLUMBUS.RR.COM writes:

About the list. Since it is possible to reject messages that have
attachments. Are too long and meet other criteria. Maybe it would be a good
idea to see if they can either set up the server to reject messages with
"words from the world of poor language."

I know that we would still get the misspelled and out of the ordinary foul
words to the list. But it would resolve having over 800 people having to
file harrasment claims on the people that choose to be so offensive.

For the people that are wanting to take part in the list and not have to
put up with all of the poor postings. I hope you all hang in to the list.;)

Jim Corvette (Cornette)