Re: response to Tara
From: "Joe Earles" <jearles@BERKSHIRE.RR.COM>
To: <CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM>
Date: Thu
14 Feb 2002 17:59:35 -0500
That's the saddest part about celebrity on any level, though. I think
the guys in Creed would still like to be able to get closer to the fans
once in a while but there are people out there with a very unhealthy
obsession with the band (I'm obsessed with the band but I'm not stalking
them or following them around from city to city or...well you get the
point). There are people who look at Scott Stapp as a sort of Messiah
and then there's the....how'd someone here put it...."Higher Girls" that
make it real difficult to be approachable. Scott, I think, had a real
hard time for a period dealing with celebrity status (hence the whole
thing in the tattoo parlor and the "Pearl Jam heckler" in that bar) and
well... let's just say Scott's not someone I'd want throwing punches at
me.  We also wouldn't know about those incidents if they'd happened
while Creed was still playing the bars for $200 a gig.
----- Original Message -----
From: ]\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[
To: CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: response to Tara

    I love how Chastity tries to come across as smarter than others, and yet she can't get a post to the list most of the time (even when she tries, she fails).
    And so far as I know, they don't make trailers as big as the house Tara lives in... seems that *someone* was talking out of their ass about someone they obviously know nothing about.
    Should someone bother to point out to Chastity that the members of Creed were VERY approachable until the obsessive compulsive fans came along and fucked it up for the REAL fans?  Would she even understand, or would she throw back another failed verbal assault instead?  I'm guessing on the latter, as that appears to be the extent of the contributions to any conversation on her part.
 
¤]\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[¤