From: "Dave Brush" <brushd@CLARKSON.EDU> To: <CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM> Date: Thu 14 Feb 2002 16:37:05 -0500 |
----- Original Message -----From: TaraSent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 6:09 PMSubject: Re: response to nightsstormWait, wait, wait... so Chastity looks so good that instead of obsessing about someone she might have the remote chance of actually meeting, she chooses to obsess over someone who's pretty much completely unreachable? *Tara shakes her head in confusion*. I guess I'm still short on sleep from the Detroit show. Or is she implying that she's too good for "regular people" because she's allegedly so incredibly attractive?<insert sarcasm font> It's so nice to know that there are still people out there who judge the merits of others based on appearance, and think that their worth can be measured by what they look like. To pick a boyfriend based on whether or not he looks like a popular musician seems like such a great idea.Speaking of boyfriends... I guess we can assume that the boyfriend "Chas" referred to having is basically a Scott Stapp clone, huh? Since no one else would be worthy of the privilege of looking upon her exquisite beauty...*cough, cough*----- Original Message -----From: TanyaSent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:10 PMSubject: Re: response to nightsstormI think I hear a phone ringing somehwere.....----- Original Message -----From: Chastity WatersSent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PMSubject: Re: response to nightsstormThank God I look good enough that I don't have to be obsessed with regular people, but just to get things straight. Jason if you look like Scott Stapp I will happily start calling you my boyfriend, despite what you wife would think.
Chas