From: "Joe Earles" <jearles@BERKSHIRE.RR.COM> To: <CREED-DISCUSS@WINDUPLIST.COM> Date: Tue 12 Feb 2002 20:56:43 -0500 |
----- Original Message -----From: ]\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:44 PMSubject: Re: SEXY SCOTT STAPPYou know Tanya, you could have summed it up in much less words."Scott is banging a Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader, and he's way out of your league anyway Chastity. If he was NHL, you would be Peewee Floor Hockey".I imagine that statement would have gotten the point through much better, and something tells me that she would have understood it too.¤]\[][G}{T§TÖ®]v[¤----- Original Message -----From: Tanya BoydSent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:30 PMSubject: Re: SEXY SCOTT STAPP<snip Tanya attempting to explain reality to Chastity>Fucking line limits, I sent this ages ago and since I "don't" sit at my computer all day, I just got the rejection notice. Hopefully Chastity can still follow along.----- Original Message -----From: Chastity WatersSent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:36 PMSubject: Re: SEXY SCOTT STAPPMy dearest Tanya, actually I could careless if I am killing you are not. Noone cares who he is dating well wrong, I do. Sorry not all of us can get paid a lot of money at 25 and bullshit on the computer all day. As I've told you kids before if you can't say something nice don't say anything at all and most important, IF YOU DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO MY QUESTIONS, DON'T RESPOND TO MY FUCKING E-MAIL.
Thanks Tanya, Have a Great Day
-Chastity