Kathryn Rhoden wrote:

> Jim get it threw your stubborn head that this list is NOT going to be
> civil anytime soon, just cuz you want it to be.  WTF is your problem!
> Learn the fucking facts and deal with it.  Damm
>
> Kat
>
> In a message dated 1/29/2002 9:30:06 PM Central Standard Time,
> creed7m3live@COLUMBUS.RR.COM writes:
>
>
>> I'm still fighting for a more civil Creed list.
>
The purpose of the list is to give an outlet for Creed discussions. Not
a list to find entertainment in dissing others. But who also criticize
others for personal attacks toward their favorites.

I'm in the point of view. Where I don't really get into Creed's music
anymore. I am debating the factor about the bitter state of the list,
being a major influence to the lack of enjoyment.

The early Creed list perpetuated my love for Creed's music. The album
(MOP) was a major album to discuss. A greater civility and maturity for
the list environment, would do well to increase the enjoyment of Creed's
latest effort.

It's a losing battle. To get the list to a civil state. But a cause
short of impossible. I'd rather see the list shut down. Than to see the
propulsion of bitterness and others inabilities to understand each other.

Jim